A Biographical Dictionary of English Court Musicians, 1485–1714. Compiled by Andrew Ashbee and David Lasocki, assisted by Peter Holman and Fiona Kisby. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998. [xxvi, 1249 pp. in 2 volumes. ISBN 1-85928-087-0. $152.95.]
Reviewed by John Milsom*
1.1 Anyone who works on English music of
the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries already owes Andrew Ashbee a huge
debt of gratitude for his eight-volume series Records of English Court
Music (1986–95). These meticulously researched books trawl through
the archives with extraordinary thoroughness, but inevitably the raw data
they present is often hard to digest. As a supplement, Ashbee has now
produced the present two-volume work, which both summarizes the raw data
and amplifies it from other sources. Others have helped him with the task,
principally David Lasocki, and to a lesser extent Peter Holman and Fiona
Kisby. Nevertheless the dictionary is really a monument to Ashbees sharp
eyes, careful transcriptions, and quite literally decades of hard work
in the archives. The dictionary itself occupies 1187 well-filled pages
and is followed by useful appendices and an index, all within sturdy bindings.
It is not cheap, but the quantity of information and quality of production
fully justify the cost.
2.1 This is a biographical dictionary of the singers and violinists, trumpeters and harpers, whether British-born or foreign, who were paid for their labors out of the royal purse. Many of these musicians also composed, but in general the archival records deal with payments for performing, only very occasionally for composing, and the dictionary makes no attempt to provide work-lists for composers or commentary on their musical achievements. This is no great loss; the revised edition of The New Grove, with its emphasis on composers, will soon serve us well in those respects, and although the biographies in The New Grove are bound to compete with the Biographical Dictionary for major figures such as Henry Purcell, it is to the Biographical Dictionary that we will still turn for detailed information about men such as Henrys relative, Thomas Purcell (1627–82), who was principally a singer and instrumentalist rather than a composer.
2.2 The Biographical Dictionary covers everyone, no matter how slight their connection with the court. Every chorister of the Chapel Royal, every trumpeter, every musician in ordinary gets a mention, plus a reference to the relevant volume(s) of the parent work. Cross-references are also given to other biographical sources—a vital link, since Records deals only with court records, whereas the musicians themselves usually had lives and careers elsewhere. There are even entries for figures who, like Sampson Estwick, are connected to court circles only by second-person report (Hawkins in this case), not by archival record.
2.3 No attempt has been made to turn the
facts into elegant cameos; only rarely do the authors try to fill out
the evidence with biographical speculation. Quotations from contemporary
witnesses such as Evelyn, Pepys and Ashmole add many human touches, and
details of wills are provided wherever possible. There are no illustrations,
but the existence of a portrait will always be mentioned.
3.1 Inevitably, a biographical dictionary arranged aphabetically by musicians name includes facts that will be of interest to those who are not centrally concerned with biography. For them, the index is a vital resource; and it only partly satisfies. If you are searching for court musicians with (say) a Cambridge degree or a connection with Kings College, you will find the indexs blanket entry for Cambridge—60 page references—strangely undifferentiated, certainly when compared with the indexs careful breakdown of London Companies or parish churches. There are no entries in the index for printing and publishing, for book ownership, or for payments for music copying, all of them strange omissions bearing in mind todays interest in the history of the book. Women feature in the dictionary—the singer Leonora Albrici, for instance—but the index will not help you locate them. Pepys and Evelyn make guest appearances on many pages of the dictionary, but one looks in vain for them in the index, which is principally of places, not of persons. If you are searching for lute-makers, neither the index nor the appendices will help you locate William Allaby, and presumably others of his kind who never achieved official status at court. In short, there are times when one wishes that the Biographical Dictionary were searchable electronically, and not a printed book—or, rather, that it existed in both formats, much as the new edition of The New Grove will do.
3.2 Far better served—and this is to be
expected by the very nature of the Biographical Dictionary—are
readers who want to know about the history of institutional music-making
at court. The appendices include important chronological lists of instrumentalists
and singers; and, for the first time, it is possible to see accurately
at a glance the full succession of singing men of the Chapel Royal, from
Kite and Banaster in the late fiftheenth century right up to the age of
Purcell. Also worth mentioning is the finding-list of variant spellings
of names (printed at the start of vol. 1), useful not so much for locating
Oostrewijck among the myriad ways of representing his distinctive name,
but rather for showing how Massu can stand for Manseno and Merton
4.1 Those who work on English music in the age of Cornish or Byrd, Child, or Purcell will at some stage almost certainly need to consult these volumes. For most peoples purposes, the Biographical Dictionary will function perfectly well without Records by its side. If, however, you already have a set of Records on your shelves, it would be a false economy not to supplement it with the Biographical Dictionary, since the new work is so much more than a summary of the records themselves. Research libraries should make every effort to shelve all these books together, to benefit readers who will need to turn quickly from one to the other. Conveniently, all the volumes are the same height, and the black bindings of the Biographical Dictionary contrast nicely with the red of Records.
* John Milsom (firstname.lastname@example.org)
has published widely in the field of Tudor music. He is currently at work
on a new catalog of musical source materials at Christ Church, Oxford,
and a monograph provisionally titled Decisions and Revisions in Renaissance
Copyright © 2000 by the Society for Seventeenth-Century Music. All rights reserved.
 Copyrights for individual items published in The Journal of Seventeenth-Century Music (JSCM) are held by their authors. Items appearing in JSCM may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the author(s), and advance notification of the editors of JSCM.
 Any redistributed form of items published in JSCM must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which the items are to appear:
 Libraries may archive issues of JSCM in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the editors of JSCM, who will act in accordance with the decisions of the Society for Seventeenth-Century Music.
 Citations to articles from JSCM should include the URL as found at the beginning of the article and the paragraph number; for example:
This document and all portions thereof are protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. Material contained herein may be copied and/or distributed for research purposes only.