2.2 By far the longest paper is Joel Speerstra's attempt to determine which of C.P.E. Bach's 342 keyboard works were intended for clavichord; it includes an elaborate table listing all of them together with Speerstra's conclusions. These conclusions will not convince all readers, particularly those sensitive to factors that resist reduction to a database. Speerstra's analysis of compositional factors is particularly susceptible to tendentious reasoning; and he would like to believe that C.P.E. Bach used the word Clavier exclusively to indicate the clavichord (though his table does recognize the fortepiano as a possibility as well).
2.3 There are appreciations of clavichord music composed by Ernst Wilhelm Wolf (by Paul Simmonds), Johann Gottfried Müthel (by Menno van Delft), Franz Seydelmann (by Bernard Brauchli), and Herbert Howells (by Bruce W. Glenny). Christopher Hogwood surveys the repertoire in general and offers a brief history of Bebung, both as described in treatises beginning with C. P. E. Bach's Versuch (1753) and as notated with a series of dots under a slur in early editions. Hogwood reminds us also of the distinction between Bebung (repeated pressure on the same key) and Tragen der Töne (pressure on each of several keys in turn).
2.4 Perhaps of interest only to some specialists
are the papers devoted to specific historical instruments and the problems
of restoring these, papers presented by Luigi Ferdinando Tagliavini, Grant
O'Brien, and Bernard Brauchli together with Jörg Gobeli. In other
papers, Derek Adlam and Richard Troeger discuss the revival of clavichord
building in England and the United States, and the role of Arnold Dolmetsch
in this. John Barnes, in "The Parallel Between the Harpsichord and Clavichord
Revivals in the Twentieth Century," suggests that the reason why Dolmetsch's
smaller clavichords of his own design found more favor than his larger
Hass copies is that "they are easier for pianists to play .. . . and,
most importantly, they responded better to vibrato." According to Barnes,
the clavichord's capacity for "vibrato" was its most appealing feature
for twentieth-century musicians.
Copyright © Society for Seventeenth-Century Music. All Rights Reserved.
Items appearing in JSCM may be saved and stored in electronic or paper form, and may be shared among individuals for purposes of scholarly research or discussion, but may not be republished in any form, electronic or print, without prior, written permission from the Editor-in-Chief of JSCM.
Any authorized redistribution of an item published in JSCM must include the following information in a form appropriate to the medium in which it is to appear:
This item appeared in the Journal of Seventeenth Century Music (http://www.sscm-jscm.org/) [volume, no. (year)], and it is republished here with permission.
Libraries may archive issues of JSCM in electronic or paper form for public access so long as each issue is stored in its entirety, and no access fee is charged. Exceptions to these requirements must be approved in writing by the Editor-in-Chief of JSCM.
Website Design and Development by Crooked River Design.